PRTIER

Atelier · Analyst workbench

Engagement console

⌘K palette · internal only · never client-facing

EngagementPropertyPhaseQual.PackTo visit
ENG-0004Kisaragi HotelAnalysis & report8610/10—
ENG-0005Hakone Ryokan (resort_ryokan)Day 0 — remote modeling617/1012 d
ENG-0006Marunouchi Arcade (retail_adjacent)Qualification343/1041 d
PROSPECT-0011Kyoto Machiya CollectionProspect — sentiment map———

Report build — blocked

2 zones carry drawing-sourced area that was never laser-verified: Gallery corridor, Sakura Ballroom. Doc 04 Day 1 exit criterion — no unverified area on any zone named in a top-five hypothesis. The gate names the reason rather than failing silently.

Zone economics explorer

occ_sweep · zone × daypart

Zone06–1011–1414–1717–2121–01rev_psm
hatched
¥3,120
hatched
¥9,840
¥7,260
¥4,180
¥2,140
¥5,610

Basis: extracts 2025-04 → 2026-03 · day types observed: peak + shoulder · ∅ marks non-transacting zones, which carry rev_psm = 0 by definition and are analysed through adjacency capture.

Findings desk

91 qualification score

f-01 · Lobby Lounge West

Observed across both day types

Lobby Lounge West holds afternoon occupancy at 61% while contributing 42% below the comp-cell median per sqm.

Mechanism — Non-transacting dwell. Seating is configured for waiting, not for ordering; no service sightline from the west banquettes.

Effect range 6.2–11.4 M JPY / yr

Confounders: Renovation of adjacent retail arcade, Nov 2025; Occupancy mix shift toward group

f-02 · Bar 21 + Lobby Lounge West

Observed pattern — pre-test estimate

Bar 21 captures 71% of its occupancy after 21:00 but sits 39% under comp-cell contribution per sqm.

Mechanism — Adjacency failure — the lobby lounge does not hand off to the bar; no visual or circulatory cue at the threshold.

Effect range 3.8–7.1 M JPY / yr

Confounders: Two-day observation window only; Citywide event, 12–13 Feb

f-03 · Club Lounge 18F

Observed across both day types

Club Lounge 18F breakfast occupancy of 48% displaces all-day dining covers at the highest-margin daypart.

Mechanism — Entitlement cannibalisation — club access is bundled at a rate that undercuts the dining contribution.

Effect range 2.1–4.6 M JPY / yr

Confounders: Resident/non-resident split incomplete for Jan

Only testedfindings may render the word “effect” without a range. The causal-overreach guard is a template constraint (doc 04), not a review step — which is why it survives a tired analyst at 1 a.m.